When guest-editing Radio 4′s Today Programme in December 2010, Colin Firth commissioned a studyd as one of four co-authors of an academic paper into human brains. He asked scientists to scan the brains of politicians to see if there was any difference dependent on political leaning. Publish is the the journal Current Biology the paper was hailed as a “useful contribution”.
Initially the brains of Conservative Alan Duncan and Labour’ Stephen Pound were scanned by Geraint Rees, from University College London’s Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience. The research was continued with replicationanother 90 participants; the scan showed an association between thicker areas within the brain and Liberal and Conservative attitudes. Following a repeat of the study researchers found that they were able to predict political leaning from a brain scan with 72% accuracy.
“It is a useful contribution because it builds on and extends previous work.” This is is a quote from New York University’s Professor John Jost, one of the world’s leading authorities in political psychology.”It will probably be several years before we understand the full meaning of these results. In the meantime, the field of political neuroscience could do worse than having Colin Firth as a scientific ambassador.”
