Tag Archive: Business


We’ve all seen the media items on this topic but what exactly does it all mean?
According to some articles the UK’s Department of Health (DoH) is seeking urgent help to create a failure regime in the National Health Service, this is because the NHS is apparently over budget in several areas but this can’t be resolved through shifting the managerial responsibility in other words you are simply shifting the problem rather than solving it. Politics of today states that there is a noticeable commitment to the virtues of private enterprise and competition in the free market. However, there is no need for the government to relinquish control of the NHS. General health care for all is a widely accepted as a right in this country. If the government wants to improve the NHS they should raise taxes in order for the public to raise the standard of a national health care service for all. People have always paid for public services through taxation“ this is not a new radical solution. However in the current situation people will resent an increase in taxes as the prices are increasing as a result of the “credit crunch”. The nature of private businesses creates an environment of competition, as a result resources and facilities as companies compete for “business” and consequently facilities and services improve. These “funds” are essential to the NHS system can only raise the standard of treatment patients will receive.

On the other hand the privatisation of the NHS will result in an emphasis on efficiency and profit; the vulnerable and the poorest in society will suffer from such a scenario. The question of prioritising health care and rationing will always favour the rich, since targeting vulnerable groups will be an inefficient use of resources so it will result in the poorer people within society suffering as they will be unable to afford adequate healthcare this will create a vicious circle because the poor will perish then the next “level of in income” will become the poor and so in until eventually you end up in the same situation that you started with. So ultimately “you’re damned if you do and you’re damned if you don’t” because you need the funds to resolve some of the issues within the NHS but then a large percentage of society suffers if you privatise so either way you can’t win.

This is a hotly debated subject some experts argue that there is no difference between the two terms and that they can be used interchangeably. Those who argue that there is a difference claim that that personnel is more administrative (dealing with payroll etc.) whereas Human Resource is responsible for managing the workforce (recruitment, conflict resolution etc.). It is argued that Personnel are reactive providing a response to demands as they are present themselves on the other hand HR is proactive because it involves the development of functions and policies for the purposes of improving the workforce.

Most people argue that those who claim that there is a difference fail to explain the differences in day to day roles of both titles. Those that say that there is a difference claim that it is a subtle philosophical one, Sultan Chand claimed that Personnel are motivated by compensation, rewards and job simplification. HR considers work groups, challenges and creativity on the job as motivational factors. In Personnel (which is also called personnel management) improved satisfaction is deemed to be the cause for improved performance but in HR it is the other way round; performance is the cause and satisfaction is the result.

So in conclusion there are a few subtle differences although some businesses do use the terms interchangeably, without detrimental effects to their business therefore one can assume that the differences described above are not significant enough to have any real effect.

Training can help develop business as it allows staff to gain new skills; this is good for several reasons for a start you wont need to spend time and money recruiting more staff. Also if staff are update with current practice and are able to work efficiently then you are likely to have a more productive business which can ultimately mean more money. In terms of the medical professions training can keep staff up to date with protocol and the latest treatments thus meaning able to save more lives and possibly even reduce waiting times for patients therefore in private practices making more money as you are seeing more patients.

Training can also keep staff motivated as they are able to develop as a person or perhaps gain promotion within the company, which can be beneficial to you as a boss as it frees up your time as you can delegate and give your staff more responsibility. Confidence can be a benefit of training as the staff gain new skills as well as reinforcing their existing knowledge, this can act as motivation; it can also be an advantage from a boss’ perspective as if you were looking to expand you can promote your existing staff as confidence is one of the factors of a good leader/manager.