Tag Archive: healthcare


In an attempt to transform services and improve value for money a lot of healthcare organisations have turned to Lean as the basis of their improvement efforts. It is not a new concept in fact its origins can be traced back to the 15th Century when the Venetian Navy introduced a ‘flow line’ for the production of war ships. Most people though would trace its history from its implementation within Toyota where is acquired the name of the ‘Toyota Production System’ and this became ‘Lean’ in the book ‘Lean Thinking’ that was published in 1996.

However, whilst the history of Lean in manufacturing is well established, it has only been over the last five or so years that Lean has found its way into the healthcare sector. The initial focus of Lean in healthcare was very ‘point’ focused, such as fixing low level problems in a pathology lab or dealing with theatre capacity. When organisations realised that such a low level approach was unlikely to lead to changes that lasted, the focus changed to ‘end to end’ clinical pathways, but in the early days this meant from the start point till the end point for a patient within a single organisation.
Amnis Courses

As Lean has matured, more people have started to experiment with pan-health economy Lean and this is where Lean moves from being a tactical tool to a strategic approach. It is still early days for the larger projects but there are already signs of success that significantly outweigh the many problems any form of transformation activity within the healthcare sector will experience.

In particular, because Lean consultants generally use a lot of jargon and even today use a lot of manufacturing related examples, it can be very off-putting for front-line healthcare staff. Even more damaging though is when Lean is used as a punishment because a team are under-performing or where the leadership team have hidden motives.

Lean can also experience problems after implementation if the focus is not on turning the changes in the process that have been achieved (such as new referral process) into a change in behaviour (which is achieved when people no longer realise that the process is ‘new’). With a lot of the early adopters of Lean focusing on the exciting parts of Lean, such as ‘Rapid Improvement Events’, the aspects of successful programmes that really make the difference have been forgotten, such as making sure that the Lean programme aligns with the organisational objectives, engaging frontline staff and dealing with any problems that arise along the way through some form of ‘Continuous Improvement’ process.

Healthcare organisations are already experiencing many of the problems that manufacturers have had to deal with for several decades, namely how to turn great ‘brown paper’ plans into real changes and then how to make those changes stick. It may not be surprising to realise that up to 75% of Lean programmes will never deliver long-term change, instead consisting of a series of exciting (yet ultimately wasteful) Rapid Improvement Events, and that is the same in healthcare as it is in manufacturing.

The choices for healthcare organisations going Lean is either to do it properly and ensure that the changes stick, which can be very demanding of management time, or trying a few isolated projects where the benefits ultimately drift away.

The key to success is to ensure that you adopt an approach to Lean that is flexible for your organisation and not rigidly imposed by a management consultancy to suit them and also to develop the internal capability of your staff as quickly as possible so that they can take the reins for your improvement programme. Ensuring all of this works is where the leadership team need to ensure that the targets they set for their Lean projects will deliver the organisational objectives and that everyone, from the boardroom to the wards, understands what needs to be done, why and by when.

This article was taken from Training Bulletin and is run by a company called amnis if you wish to get more details on this follow this link Accelerated Lean Skills Programme.

UK researchers claim that antidepressants get to work immediately to lift mood, contrary to current belief.
The researchers state that although patients may not notice the effects until months into the therapy, they work subconsciously. According to Oxford University Researchers the action is rapid, occuring within hours of taking the drugs.

Dr Michael Thase, a psychiatrist from the University of Pennsylvania, said the findings challenged conventional wisdoms and were potentially “paradigm-changing”. “The highest research priority is to confirm that the rapid effects observed in this study are predictive of eventual clinical benefit.”

He said it was possible that switching off the negative thoughts was a crucial part of the therapy.

Alternatively, it might merely be a sign that the drug was beginning to work at the cell level in the brain.

Paul Farmer, chief executive of Mind, said: “This research may contribute to our understanding of how our bodies respond to antidepressants, but the changes recorded can’t always be felt by patients and it can be some weeks before they begin to feel the symptoms of depression easing.

“We must also remember that the side-effects of medication can often be felt straight away long before the benefits really kick in, and this will always affect people’s experiences in the initial stages of treatment.”

Statistics show that more than £600 million is the cost to the NHS for patients failing to keep hospital appointments. That’s enough to run two medium-size hospitals! The figures show that between 2007 and 2008 6.5 million patients missed appointments which cost hospitals £100 per patient in revenue. In order to compensate for this some places are overbooking to compensate for people not attending, however there are drawbacks with this idea such as disadvantaging patients if 100% attendance occurs. Young males appear to make up the biggest portion of those that don’t attend appointments. At the opposite end of the scale people aged between 70 and 74 were the most conscientious in terms of attending appointments. However it isn’t all doom and gloom, over the past few years the attendance figures have improved slightly in England, Northern Ireland and Wales. Unfortunately the same can’t be said about Scotland where figures have increased.

Schemes such as sending text message reminders are being rolled out by the Department of Health. Whilst some say that missing appointments is unforgivable Unison is saying that the patients are not to blame when appointments are arranged months in advance. Other initiatives such as the choose and book scheme have also been introduced in order to reduce the number of missed appointments.

It is common courtesy to inform the doctor that you won’t be able to make the appointment or that you no longer require their services. Obviously this can’t be done if you forget but simply not attending is just rude and also selfish as not only is it wasting health professionals’ time and money but it is also impacting on others such as those who are on waiting lists or need to make an appointment but are unable to get one because the doctors are fully booked.

The chemical DEET which is found in many insect repellent sprays has been shown to be toxic and can cause fits in children, the current advice is that it should not be used by pregnant women. In research studies DEET blocked the enzyme cholinesterase, which is essential for sending messages between the muscles and the brain which can cause muscle spasms and in severe cases death. Other side effects of DEET are excessive salivation and eye watering.

DEET, is also known as diethyl toluamide, and is used in a many repellent sprays. Initially it was thought that the DEET simply altered the insects sense of smell to prevent them from detected the smell of the human. However on further study it was found that it acts on the enzyme which is present in both insects and mammals. Therefore the idea that it simply modifies insect behaviour is false as it directly inhibits enzyme activity in both mammal and insect nerves, research also shows that DEET interacts and strengthens the toxicity of carbamates, a class of insecticides also known to block acetylcholinesterase.

This research raises questions with regards to the safety of insect repellents, however at present it is mainly based on theory and tests on animals if you are at all concerned speak to a pharmacist or a doctor. Alternatively try alternatives from your health food shop

We all know that good communication is key but it is not always practised as the coroners reports are showing, there seems to be a high number of deaths which could have been avoided. Since the rules were changed last year, coroners have been able to write detailed reports following inquests that highlighted a risk of more deaths occurring. Coroners reported that better communication could reduce the number of deaths occurring in hospital.

Out 207 reports between July 2008 and March 2009, 58 arose from hospital deaths, 19 were classed as mental health related, 19 were associated with community healthcare and emergency services and 11 were linked to drugs and medication.

So what is good communication?
Good communication is sharing information is a clear and concise manner with everyone who is involved in the care of the patient, it is also ensuring that the patient fully understands what is going; obviously in emergency situations this is not always possible at the time but after the emergency has passed they need to be told what is going on. This will minimise the chance of the patient possibly taking the wrong medication or committing suicide because they become depressed.

There are a number of courses available which are designed to help improve communication skills. One particularly good one is done by Medicology, Communication Skills for Doctors.

The Social Market Foundation claims that forcing patients to pay for appointments would help the NHS to cope in times of financial hardship. Both the government and doctors are against such a move, one doctor says: “All patients have a right to free healthcare that is based on their clinical needs, not the size of their bank balance.”

The Social Market Foundation base their argument on the fact that while funding is guaranteed until 2011, many are expecting the budget to be frozen or cut after that. They state that the only way for the NHS to cope was to raise taxes to put more money into the system, limit demand or work more effectively. Those who support this idea say that charging people would make them think twice about whether their visit was essential, they argue that the move is not about making money but a small charge like this could help reduce appointments by about 5%. They also say that children and those receiving tax credits should not be charged and said the think-tank was opposed to fees being levied on any form of emergency care.

Those who oppose the scheme claim that charging for appointments would undermine the doctor patient relationship and may put some people who need the care from coming to the surgery. They also argue that it is against the founding principles of the NHS, which is free healthcare for all. However there is a flaw in this argument as the NHS already charges for prescriptions and dental treatment.

If the movement to charge patients is introduced are we not simply privatising healthcare? In many other countries there is no free healthcare, but there is help for those on low wages so it could work. It seems to me that we are merely shifting the financial burden to the public. It also means that those who have to see the doctor on a regular basis as a result of an existing conditions such as diabetes would end up spending a fortune

Top health officials for the UN have started a forum in Mexico on combating swine flu by saying the spread of the virus is now unstoppable. Current statistics show over 100 countries reporting cases of the virus, Dr Chan from the WHO claims; “….once a fully fit pandemic virus emerges, its further international spread is unstoppable.”

The UK is predicting more than 100,000 new cases of H1N1 a day in the UK alone by the end of the summer.
Whilst Mexico swine flu cases have decreased. In South America the peak of the flu season is approaching, as a result some areas have declared a public health emergency. However it is worth mentioning that in the 2 months since the outbreak of swine flu it has only killed approximately 300 people worldwide which when you put it into context isn’t really that many, obviously it is a tragedy for those who knew these people. In the UK the latest figures show only 26 people have died from the virus, which is minimal when regular flu claims the lives of around 6,000 people a year.

In the UK Health Secretary,Andy Burnham has come under fire from the Liberal Democrats who claim fighting within government departments led to the hotline which offers information on the virus and what to do to avoid catching it and what to do if you suspect that you have the virus being launched six months late. Although this claim is flawed as the outbreak of the virus was only announced 2 months ago. It was hoped that the hotline would take the pressure off frontline NHS staff and enable them to deal with other illnesses

Before everyone starts to panic the WHO says most cases of H1N1 (swine flu) are mild, with recovery within a week and often without any medical treatment. The exceptions, she said, were pregnant women and people with underlying health problems, who were at higher risk from complications from the virus and should be monitored if they fall ill.

Scientists claim that they have uncovered a reason why obese people have a raised risk of health complications such as type 2 diabetes. The cause seems to be a specific protein – pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) – which is secreted by fat cells hence the reason people who are obese have higher levels of the protein in their blood. Scientists claim that this can be treated by blocking the protein.

It seems that the protein triggers tissue in the muscle and the liver to develop an insulin resistance, PEDF levels are also believed to release fats into the bloodstream, raising the risk of complications such as heart disease. Therefore tackling insulin resistance directly, even in the absence of weight loss, could potentially strengthen our ability to help obese patients reduce their risk of life-shortening disease

These findings mean that a drug can be developed which blocks blocks the protein. This is believed to reduce the number of obese people suffering from the life threatening conditions but this does not cure the obesity therefore wouldn’t it make more sense to deal with the obesity which would in turn reduce the health risks?

Healthcare in Europe is run through a variety of systems which operate on a national level, in Germany it is a mix of public and private funded healthcare; although throughout Europe it is predominately funded by private health insurance Although their are government alternatives such as the EHIC which has replaced the E111.

Here is a list published by the World Health Organisation which shows the top European countries ranking both within Europe and also in terms of the whole world:

  • 1st France
  • 2nd Italy
  • 3rd San Marino (its at the top of Italy)
  • 4th Andorra (its between France and Spain)
  • 5th Malta

In France people earning less than 6,600 euros per year do not have to contribute to the cost of their healthcare; but due to the fact that it is largely privatised there is a high quality service without the waiting times of the NHS. Apart from those mentioned above people pay a premium for their healthcare which is approximately 20% of their payroll (employers paid 12.8% and employees 6.8%) this however caused problems with employers complaining that they were meeting too much of the burden…probably because it meant less profit for them; anyway this led to reform. The insurers are non-government, non-profit agencies, which owe allegiance to employers and employees. As well as their compulsory contribution most employees pay an additional voluntary 2.5% of their salary to a mutual insurer.

The French are able to enjoy freedom of choice when choosing their medical practioner, whether GP or specialist, and typically pay their doctor’s fee and then claim back 75-80%. Payment may deter the poorest people from seeking care and so when this was recognised legislations were introduced to help these people so about 6 million people are not expected to pay. All patients, may go directly to a specialist either outside or within a hospital.

The evidence suggests that French Healthcare is considerably better than that provided by the NHS, but as the saying goes “the grass is always greener on the other side”. If you weigh up the merits of both systems they probably work out about the same

Health care in the United States is provided by several separate legal entities it is estimated that the U.S. spends more on health care than any other nation in the world. In 2007, the U.S. spent a projected $2.26 trillion on health care, or $7,439 per person. In the U.K that would equate to approximately £3,700 per person. This is due to the sheer size of the U.S.A and the fact that it is divided into many states therefore a system such as the NHS would be impractical.

According to the Institute of Medicine, the U.S. is the only wealthy, industrialized nation that does not have a universal health care system. Around 84.7% of U.S citizens have some form of health insurance; either through their employer, purchased individually or provided by government programs. There are a few publicly-funded health care programs to provide for the elderly, disabled, children, veterans, and the poor. There is a federal law in place that basically states that the public are entitled to emergency treatment regardless of their ability to pay.

As with any system the U.S healthcare system is not without problems. For example it is estimated that 47 million U.S citizens, 8.7 million of which are children, are without any health insurance with this figure rapidly increasing as employers are shifting the cost to employees who are unable to meet the cost of the premiums. The costs of healthcare are rising at 5 times the rate of inflation. As a result of employers shifting the cost to employees there are strikes taking place all over the U.S such as the Southern California grocery workers’ strike and lockout in which nearly 60,000 workers saved health care benefits and beat back employer demands to freeze pension funds after holding strong on the picket line for five months. Under grocery management’s original proposals, a worker making slightly less than $20,000 a year would have had to pay nearly $5,000 to maintain the same level of benefits they had in the previous contract. Other cost increases hitting workers include larger hikes in the cost of family coverage, less access to needed prescription drugs through stricter HMO formularies and higher prices for more comprehensive coverage. According to the statistics consumers are using more prescriptions, at younger ages and for more conditions, and substituting newer, more expensive medications for established products.

In the U.K on the other hand healthcare is provided by the central government and is mostly free but there a few areas where costs apply; although there are private practices within the healthcare sector. Forming the basis of healthcare in the United Kingdom, each system—National Health Service, NHS Scotland, NHS Wales and the Health and Social Care in Northern Ireland—operates independently, and is politically accountable to the relevant devolved government of Scotland (Scottish Government), Wales (Welsh Assembly Government) and Northern Ireland (Northern Ireland Executive), and to the UK government for England.

The NHS is divided into two sectors the primary sector which includes the following:

  • NHS Direct
  • NHS walk in centres
  • GP practices
  • Dentists
  • Opticians
  • Pharmacists

The secondary sector includes the following:

  • Emergency and urgent care
  • Ambulance Trusts
  • NHS Trusts
  • Mental Health Trusts
  • Care Trusts

The NHS is also not without problems for a start the NHS is over budget in several areas by as much as £105 billion. It is also understaffed. As a result waiting times are at an all time high, although some argue that it is due to the credit crunch and the growing immigration to the U.K. As previously mentioned in the article “The privatization of the NHS” the government’s idea to resolve some of the problems with the NHS is to privatise healthcare; the question is will this actually help or is just a social construction created to justify increasing taxes to make more money for the government?